We try to find some reason behind it.
1)Standing stability from a structural point of view.
**in both case of MOI 1/2 is multiplied
in this above fig we have compared both the probable cases, As a result, we got "second can" have more mass moment of inertia means more force required to tilt, or we can say have more stability at standing position. That's why we prefered the second case over the first one.
here provided video clip is enough to understand...
Hope You Like This!
any further Addition is welcome, feel free to the discussion.
Is this similar to the case of humans having flat feet are more likely to slip than humans having curvature in their feet?
ReplyDeleteIn case of human , curvature is reason of stiffness,,more stiffness means more control over the leg.
DeleteBut flat feets has a relation to friction with the surface so I am asking does the concept of MI also applicable on feets
ReplyDeleteyup!!
Deletethanks to all
ReplyDeleteThanks for explaining
DeleteCan't we relate it to P=F/A..coz force is same in both the cases ,
ReplyDeletethe one less area of contact will be pressing the surface more and will be required more force therefore to tip it off..
we haven't related with pressure any where!
Delete